Dear Kirsten:
I’m confused. In your letter, you seem to acknowledge the severe constitutional problems with this bill, and the need to change it to address those problems. But the fact that you are a cosponsor says that you are happy with it the way it is.
Please clarify: will you vote to deprive people of their property without due process of law, if that provision is still in the bill when it comes to a vote? Or not?
Amos
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 15:12, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand <Senator@gillibrand.senate.gov> wrote:
November 3, 2011
Dear Amos,
Thank you for writing to me regarding S. 968, the PROTECT IP Act of 2011. I understand your concerns.
I am a cosponsor of this legislation because I believe that we must protect American intellectual property against foreign websites that infringe upon our rights. By empowering the Attorney General of the United States to go after foreign infringing websites, this legislation becomes a necessary tool to ensure that U.S. companies remain competitive in the world marketplace. I recognize that there are technical concerns with the enforcement of this bill that need to be addressed. I am committed to working with my colleagues in the United States Senate to ensure that this legislation protects the Constitutional rights of Americans and does not stifle lawful free speech or innovation on the internet.
Thank you again for writing to express your concerns, and I hope that you keep in touch with my office regarding future legislation. For more information on this and other important issues, please visit my website at http://gillibrand.senate.gov and sign up for my e-newsletter.
Sincerely,
Kirsten E. Gillibrand
United States Senator
I’ll post further correspondence if/when I get it. Google this bill.